Benefits Of Having A Stakeholder In The pany †Free Samples

The report talks about the   stakeholder’s relationship management and its influence on management decision-making . It explains that how stakeholders help an organization to achieve long-term growth and success. The report talks about the importance and function of the stakeholders in the pany. The report presents an example of an Australian pany, Caltex. Through the example of Caltex, the features, responsibilities and the working of the stakeholders are explained in the report. The report explains that how the different types of stakeholders provide support for the betterment of the pany as well as society. It tells that how stakeholders important for the pany success and growth. It shows the relationship between stakeholders and the   management of the pany. The advantages and disadvantages of the relationship management have been explained in the report. The good and bad relationship with the management is also explained. Further, the report describes the multi- advocacy of the relationship management. The report tells about the responsibilities of the stakeholders towards the pany and it also explains the pany attitude towards the stakeholder. The report explains that there should be a good relationship between pany and stakeholders because Stakeholder is responsible for controlling and monitoring the financial activities of the pany. No firm can run the business without a stakeholder. A stakeholder solves the entire problems that are faced by the pany due to the finance. The pany decisions can be affected by the presence of stakeholders. It explains that how stakeholders help and guide to the pany for taking investment decisions. Further, Caltex pany of Australia has been taken as the example in the report. Caltex is a lubricant, fuels and Oil pany. It was founded in 1936 in Australia. The pany has a good reputation in this country. It is expanding its business activities and operations with effective stakeholder’s policies. The st akeholders of the pany are experienced and professionals and well qualified. The growth of the pany mainly depends on the strategies are made by the stakeholders of the firm (Bryson, Patton &Bowman, 2011). The stakeholders are responsible for maintaining and controlling the monetary transactions of the pany. A stakeholder of any pany deals withholding of the shares. They are also responsible for the growth and success of the firm. A stakeholder solves the problem that is faced by the firm due to finance. The stakeholder’s presence can affect the organization and it can also be affected by the pany’s decision (Hà ¶risch, Freeman and Schaltegger, 2014). They invest the money on the behalf of the firm. They serve as a guide to the organization and the market. The pany depends on stakeholders in order to gain long-term growth and success in the business. It is a moral duty of the pany to trust the stakeholder. Further, it is the responsibility of a stakeholder to be loyal, faithful towards the pany. The stakeholders must be aware of the confidentiality of the firm and they should not share the important information of the pany with other persons. A stakeholder is responsible for managing and monitoring the decisions of the pany that is related to the finance (Beringer, Jonas & Kock, 2013). They should take effective decision to gain the petitive advantages in near future. The stakeholder is accountable for forming and taking good and effective decisions of the association. It helps to maintain a positive relationship with the pany. The management should also share every information with its stakeholders. This will make easier for them to take efficient and effective decisions in the firm. A proper relationship among the employees of the organization and stakeholders will lead the pany towards success and growth in the market. It is the responsibility of stakeholders to fulfill the expectations and needs of the pany (Manetti & Toccafondi, 2012). They should analyze the external environment of the market to gain the long-term advantages in the firm. In this way, they can evaluate and analyze the changing market conditions and environment. For example Cal tex pany of Australia maintains the significant relationship with its stakeholders. The pany regularly provides relevant information to its stakeholders. It maintains trust, faith, and loyalty among its stakeholders. This will help to the firm to attain the long-term goals and objectives of the firm. It is the well-known and popular pany in the market (Pondeville, Swaen & De Rongà ©, 2013). The goodwill of the pany is excellent due to effective stakeholders’ policies. The Stakeholders of the pany are aware of the history and the future strategies that were followed and will be followed by the pany. This builds a strong relationship between them. Caltex has good relations with the investors. This allows other pany investors to understand the business, the management and other aspects of the pany. The Caltex maintains a good and effective relationship with their stakeholders. They fulfill entire expectations, needs, and requirements of the stakeholders. In this way, the firm p rovides various benefits to the pany (Ackermann and Eden, 2011). General External Environment factors affect the ability and potential of the business to perform the task outside of the pany. The pany needs to manipulate the external elements to gain the benefits in near future. The general external elements are set to know and analyze the market strategies so that the pany can set its own according to their marketing needs and requirements. The pany makes an effective plan with the help of stakeholders. The firm at every stage is supported by the stakeholders either internally or externally. They allow the pany to meet the requirements of the outside environments. They take care about the outside entities such as customers, clients, market etc (Edelenbos, van Buuren and van Schie, 2011). These stakeholders are responsible for taking a project from different clients and planning strategies to do work effectively and efficiently. They manage and evaluate the projects on behalf of the firm. Their aim is to achieve the goal and objectives that are set by the pany. There could be success and failure in the project. It depends upon the way through which stakeholders’ perform the functions. The stakeholders must have a proper and enough knowledge about the project in order to meet the long-term growth and success of the pany. It is important for the stakeholders to work on the assigned project firmly and professionally (Crilly & Sloan, 2012). The Primary stakeholders are end users of the firm who takes interest only in the success of the business. They only focus on the pany’s growth and success. They only take care about the results and ou e of the firm. They do not show any interest in knowing the functioning of the business. The primary aim of the primary stakeholder is to check the pany’s growth and business activities. Primary stakeholders include project managers, project sponsors, and team members (Beringer, Jonas & Kock, 2013). Secondary Stakeholders are responsible for pleting the project. They are not the end users of the firm. They are responsible for managing the project, searching sponsors for the project and contacting the investors. They also work for the growth and success of the association. They focus on the business activities and operation of the firm. The aim of the secondary stakeholders is same as the primary stakeholders.   Lack of munication and coordination is the major concern between the primary and secondary stakeholders. As a result, it reduces the pany’s reputation and goodwill in the market (Vasi & King, 2012). Internal stakeholders are responsible for developing the project. They function inside the pany’s environment. They have to check and analyze the criteria and strategies which would need to be followed by the pany. They search the project sponsors and investors to invest the money (Turner & Zolin, 2012). They check the performance of the work and make plans and strategies and solving the issues in a team. They have to ensure that project should be efficient and effective. They should the goals and objectives. External Stakeholders such as vendors and salespersons are responsible for making the product to reach the maximum number of people in the market. They are concerned and worried about the societal demands and works to fulfill these demands. They work for the welfare of the firm as well as society. They are responsible for market growth and success by reaching the number of customers. They supply the essential elements of the society and pany. The growth and progress of th e pany are dependent upon the supply of the product in the market. Direct stakeholders check and evaluate the day to day workings of the business. They are responsible for managing the project on a daily basis. They work on every new project on each day. The main objective of the direct stakeholders is to achieve the target that is set by the firm. They directly meet with the pany project criteria. On the other hand, Indirect Stakeholders are not responsible for managing the project. They are not affected by the working, customers or the end users. Results and ou es are a major concern for indirect stakeholders as like the primary stakeholders. They do not indulge in managing the things during the project but they are interested in knowing about the success of the business. They focus on the various kinds of projects. Specific External Environment allows the pany to trade outside. The organization conducts its business outside the firm for a specific purpose. These specific external forces are directly responsible for achieving the desired goal. It is the set only to achieve the specified target and goals. Every organization has a unique target and goals. They work on a single body. The targets of the panies differ according to the changing environmental conditions. The important entities of specific external environment include customers, clients, suppliers, petitors etc. The Customers or clients are those entities of the organization who purchase the products of the pany. They are individuals who use the services offered by the pany, but with the changing trends of the day to day life, the tastes and preferences of the customers are also changing. This will b e the reason of growth and success of the organization. Customers keep on the changing their lifestyle according to the environmental conditions which makes it difficult for the pany to remain stable at one point. They have to think about the various different ideas to bring to the society which will provoke them to keep buying their products. The pany has to meet the changing demands of the firm to maintain its growth and success of the firm (Yang et al, 2011). Suppliers are those entities of the pany who is responsible for maintaining a proper record for the amount of product that has been supplied and the amount of product which has been left in a stock. The more supply of the product will generate the more profit for the firm. The ultimate aim of any organization is to attain profits and revenue of the pany. These suppliers help them in achieving target and goals effectively and efficiently. They should have the power to convince people to buy their products in the market. The Supplier has to be aware of a number of products that have been supplied to the pany as per the demands of the market. The demand of the products increases the suppliers in the market. Thus, they play a vital role in success and growth of the firm (Nguyen & Mutum, 2012). Lenders are the individuals who lend money or fulfill the requirements and expectations of the pany. The lender of any pany is generally fixed by the firm. They help the pany to achieve its target and objectives by providing human resources to them (Lee, Olson and Trimi, 2012). Creditors are the people who take resources in terms of money by the pany. The firm gives them the credit to gain and achieve the name in the market. Debtors are the people who give money to the pany to flourish and expand its business in the society (Bridoux & Stoelhorst, 2014). Employees are the labor of the organization. The mon goal of every employee is to achieve the target set by the pany. Employees should be aware of the work being done in the pany and the strategy being followed by other members of the organization in order to meet the goals and objectives of the firm. A pany cannot run the business without efficient and effective employees (Hollensen, 2015). Shareholders are those individuals of the business who purchase and sell shares on the behalf of the pany (Mason and Simmons, 2014). A stakeholder is a group which shows interest in the working of the organization. They have direct and indirect interest in the business. The group may include the government, society, individual or any other pany and media. The influence of such entities in the business allows the stakeholders to operate the business effectively and efficiently. Relationship management makes plans and strategies to attract the more customers in the market. In this way, they help to increase the sale of the pany (Kumar & Reinartz, 2012). They check for the profitability and the performance of the pany as well as employees. The interaction with such stakeholders is important for the firm. They easily solve the related issues that are responsible for the success and growth of the business. The aim of stakeholder relationship management is to check the attitude, decisions, functions, and actions of the stakeholders for the benefit of themselves as well as the pany. This relationship management allows th e stakeholders to gain the benefits from the business. This helps to build and develop the trust among the firm and the stakeholders who put efforts to make the position of the pany on the top level. The relationship should be a strong and trustworthy (Lidskog, Sundqvist, Kall, Sandin & Larsson, 2013). The management should also share all the information with its stakeholders. This will b e easier for them to make efficient decisions. A proper relationship among the employees of the organization and stakeholders will lead the pany towards success and growth in the market. It is the responsibility of stakeholders to stand on the expectations and needs of the pany. They check and analyze the market conditions and environment (Bourne, 2016). It is very important to have an effective relationship with the stakeholders. It helps to resolve the difficult matters that are faced by the organization. Through the influence of stakeholders, the organization has a relief about the working on the financial matters. The performance of the organization is checked by the relationship management in order gain the progress and growth in the market (Rozanski and Woods, 2011). This results in good relations with the stakeholders as their main aim of a plishment is done by the stakeholders. They gain the attention and support of the business. They generally focus on the attitude or behavior of the stakeholders towards the pany, thus various important decisions are taken by the stakeholders. The stakeholders must inculcate the knowledge about the business or it will result in bad results. The pany can use the opinion of the stakeholders to work on the project (Mellahi, Frynas, Sun and Siegel, 2016). This is done to achieve the target and g oals as soon as possible. This will improve the quality of the project and the pany will also e to know about the stakeholders towards the business. It is important to take support from the powerful stakeholders. This will help the firm to gain more resources in the market. This will make the strong and effective relationship between the two entities; this will make the project more qualitative. municating with stakeholders time to time will ensure them about the project that pany is working on these projects properly or not.   They will suggest more good criteria for doing the project. This will also ensure the motivation of stakeholders towards the firm. The pany can know about the reaction of public towards the project. This will allow them to make effective strategies and plans for the success of the firm (Alt, Dà ­ez-de-Castro & Llorà ©ns-Montes, 2015). In a pany, a stakeholder is usually an investor. The actions of the stakeholders towards the pany depend upon the type of decisions are made by them. It is not necessary for them to hold equity shares in the business. They can also behave like the other employees working for the firm. They only focus on the success and growth of the pany. They can work for the overall firm. Their interference in every management is accepted as it is beneficial. They can run the pany as partners also. A stakeholder plays different roles in the firm. The role of stakeholder is very crucial as her decisions are effective and transform the growth of the pany (Eden & Ackermann, 2013). The importance of stakeholder relationship in an organization results in good ou es and results. This develops an interest in stakeholders to work for the firm to achieve the target. The relationship management of stakeholders also helps in making managerial decisions and a strong relationship with the managers also. It give s the managers a chance to show their ability to work and handling the responsibility of the firm. This improves the relationship of the managers towards the stakeholders and maintains the relationship for a long term. The Stakeholder relationship plays a vital role in every pany. Relationship management of a stakeholder has various significance (Smith, 2013). It is important for making decisions, it works as a managing director, it serves as an investor which is very important for the firm (Beringer, Jonas & Kock, 2013). The most important task for the stakeholders is making decisions that should be in favor of the pany. The stakeholders have the power to make or implement new ideas while working on any project. But it is also important to listen to the opinion of other members of the firm and then to make decisions keeping in mind all the suggestions. The decision made by the stakeholders should be efficient as the future of the pany. They strategies planned by them results in good ou es (Gonzà ¡lez-Benito, Lannelongue & Queiruga, 2011). Direct stakeholders have to check the day to day workings of the business. They are responsible for managing the project on a daily basis. They work on every new project each day. Their target for doing the amount of work is set which they have to achieve. They directly meet with the pany project criteria. The approach used by the board of directors and stakeholders differ in many cases. The Stakeholders can work for the human resource department to gain the long-term goals and objectives. They can directly participate in any project and can share their opinion and ideas (Fernandez-Feijoo, Romero & Ruiz, 2014). The Stakeholders are described as the inventors of the pany. They maximize or minimize the stakes in the pany according to the finance needed. They act as a supreme power for the organization. They observe the financial report to check the progress of the firm. Since they are responsible for the growth of the pany, it is their duty to invest in the business to fulfill the demands of the customers (Murillo-Luna, Garcà ©s-Ayerbe & Rivera-Torres, 2011). The stakeholders of large panies are highly respected. They have the power to shut down panies who do work according to the societal needs and also who violets the law. They check the overall functioning of the pany and take effective actions for wrong decision-making activities. They are concerned about the pany’s long-term goals. The corporate and municate with the pany and implement laws required for running the business effectively and efficiently (Lovejoy, Waters & Saxton, 2012). The Stakeholders are professionals who can easily identify the risks that prevail in the society. They are ware about the opportunities that pany can get in the near future. They research about the opportunity before taking it. They have a proper planning for every project. It helps to reduce the risk and threats of the firm. Before getting into any opportunity stakeholders first identify and analyze it thoroughly and then allow the pany to operate on the opportunity (Boxall & Purcell, 2011). Stakeholders’ duty is to give the effective suggestions on the project. They find solutions for organizations priorities and activities. The inputs given by the stakeholders increase the performance of the business. They give a relevant solution which is also accepted by the pany. They give importance to the business work because their main aim is to take long-term benefits and to meet the goals and objectives (Innes & Booher, 2012). Stakeholders serve as a guide to the pany. Due to their effective decision-making power, they are able to flourish and expand in the market. They are able to make good relationship with customers which results in positive feedbacks. The feedback of the customers motivates the pany for achieving sustainable future. For example, Caltex pany of Australia has trusted stakeholders. They are professionals who identify the risks and gives solutions to avoid those risks. The pany has employees who bring the feedback of the customers to make development in future (Neubaum, Dibrell & Craig, 2012). For example: In a pany like Caltex, it is important to collaborate with other panies for expansion. This is the difficult task. They have to search about the profits earned by each pany but it is a very difficult task (Vargo, 2011). There has been a fast evolution in the stakeholder relationship through the multi-advocacy. However, the development of multi-stakeholder advocacy is still at a lower level including the investors and the analyst who is responsible for functioning the business. The advocacy states that various organizations tie up, make effective decisions, change policy and work towards achieving the goal and objectives together. The multi advocacy of stakeholder survey and take interviews of the selected organizations before ing together. The goal of the multi advocacy stakeholders is to work jointly with all the other panies effectively (Ellis & Sheridan, 2014). There are unique methods of developing the relationship between the stakeholders and the panies are such as: Assessing Mature and Emergent Advocacy Fields, Machine Learning, and Dashboard Tracking. The advocacies between the different panies have resulted in the strategic decision-making, priding meaningful information and have generated e vidence towards the loyalty of these multi-stakeholders’ relationships towards the business. The Multi-stakeholder advocacy is aimed at sharing the goals with the well-coordinated team. The advocacy efforts of the stakeholders of different panies are focused on a particular goal and objective. They have the same target. The decisions made to achieve the goals show the thinking of the stakeholders. Stakeholders show interest in achieving the mon organizational goals. They facilitate the policy framework of the firm. Their decisions are important for the firm which results in changes in the environment. Stakeholders manage these changes for sustainable development in future. The aim of stakeholder relationship management is to check the attitude, decisions, and actions of the stakeholders for the benefit of themselves as well as the pany. The advocacies of stakeholder relationship management have proven the growth for the pany in the ing future. These advocacies have resulted i n the development of the economy. The stakeholders’ decisions have the power to change pany’s environment (Gosselin et al, 2014). The report the stakeholder’s relationship management and its influence on management decision-making. It describes the functions, roles, and significance of stakeholders in order to meet the goals and objectives. It also describes relationship management, its importance, its advantages, and disadvantages. It explains that the stakeholder is the one very important entity of the business. They are interested in serving the pany its required resources. A stakeholder solves the problem that pany faces due to financing. His presence can affect the pany and also can be affected by the pany’s decision. He tells the pany where to invest. He serves as a guide to the organization and the market. The pany depends on stakeholders for the growth of the business (Bingham, Dyer, Smith and Adams, 2011). It is a moral duty of the pany to trust the stakeholder and responsibility of a stakeholder to be loyal towards the pany. The report suggests the relationship with various other entitie s that stakeholder holds. The influence of such entities in the business allows the stakeholders to operate into business. Relationship management is something which plans strategies in a way that it binds the customer to keep buying the product. They check for the profitability and the performance of a long time. The interaction with such stakeholders is important. They easily solve the related issues that are responsible for affecting the growth of business (Keller and Price, 2011). The aim of stakeholder relationship management is to check the attitude, decisions, and actions of the stakeholders for the benefit of themselves as well as the pany. This relationship management allows the stakeholders to gain the benefits from the business. The report shows all the main important aspects of for working in the organization as a stakeholder. Further, the pany should make effective policies for the stakeholders and the firm should motivate them to do work more effectively and efficientl y. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C., 2011. Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice.  Long range planning,  44(3), pp.179-196. Alt, E., Dà ­ez-de-Castro, E.P. and Llorà ©ns-Montes, F.J., 2015. Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: the role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision.  Journal of Business Ethics,  128(1), pp.167-181. Beringer, C., Jonas, D. and Kock, A., 2013. Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.  International Journal of Project Management,  31(6), pp.830-846. Beringer, C., Jonas, D. and Kock, A., 2013. Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.  International Journal of Project Management,  31(6), pp.830-846. Beringer, C., Jonas, D. and Kock, A., 2013. Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success.  International Journal of Project Management,  31(6), pp.830-846. Bingham, J.B., Dyer, W.G., Smith, I. and Adams, G.L., 2011. A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms.  Journal of business ethics,  99(4), pp.565-585. Bourne, L., 2016.  Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. CRC Press. Boxall, P. and Purcell, J., 2011.  Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan. Bridoux, F. and Stoelhorst, J.W., 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives.  Strategic Management Journal,  35(1), pp.107-125. Bryson, J.M., Patton, M.Q. and Bowman, R.A., 2011. Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit.  Evaluation and program planning,  34(1), pp.1-12. Chan, M.C., Watson, J. and Woodliff, D., 2014. Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures.  Journal of Business Ethics,  125(1), pp.59-73. Crilly, D. and Sloan, P., 2012. Enterprise logic: explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the ‘inside?out’.  Strategic Management Journal,  33(10), pp.1174-1193. David, P., O'Brien, J.P., Yoshikawa, T. and Delios, A., 2010. Do shareholders or stakeholders appropriate the rents from corporate diversification? The influence of ownership structure.  Academy of Management Journal,  53(3), pp.636-654. Edelenbos, J., van Buuren, A. and van Schie, N., 2011. Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects.  Environmental Science & Policy,  14(6), pp.675-684. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F., 2013.  Making strategy: The journey of strategic management. Sage. Ellis, S. and Sheridan, L., 2014. A critical reflection on the role of stakeholders in sustainable tourism development in least-developed countries.  Tourism Planning & Development,  11(4), pp.467-471. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S. and Ruiz, S., 2014. Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework.  Journal of Business Ethics,  122(1), pp.53-63. Gonzà ¡lez-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G. and Queiruga, D., 2011. Stakeholders and environmental management systems: a synergistic influence on environmental imbalance.  Journal of Cleaner Production,  19(14), pp.1622-1630. Gosselin, D., Link, V.M., Romanoski, C.E., Fonseca, G.J., Eichenfield, D.Z., Spann, N.J., Stender, J.D., Chun, H.B., Garner, H., Geissmann, F. and Glass, C.K., 2014. Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities.  Cell,  159(6), pp.1327-1340. Hollensen, S., 2015.  Marketing management: A relationship approach. Pearson Education. Hà ¶risch, J., Freeman, R.E. and Schaltegger, S., 2014. Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework.  Organization & Environment,  27(4), pp.328-346. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E., 2012. Health Impact Assessment as a Tool for Engaging Stakeholders and Addressing Health Trends in Land Use and munity Planning June 29, 2012 Ruth Lindberg, National Center for Healthy Housing and Sarah Wylie, Healthy Housing Solutions. Keller, S. and Price, C., 2011.  Beyond performance: How great organizations build ultimate petitive advantage. John Wiley & Sons. Kumar, V. and Reinartz, W., 2012.  Customer relationship management: Concept, strategy, and tools. Springer Science & Business Media. Lee, S.M., Olson, D.L. and Trimi, S., 2012. Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values.  Management Decision,  50(5), pp.817-831. Lidskog, R., Sundqvist, G., Kall, A.S., Sandin, P. and Larsson, S., 2013. Intensive forestry in Sweden: stakeholders' evaluation of benefits and risk.  Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences,  10(3-4), pp.145-160. Lovejoy, K., Waters, R.D. and Saxton, G.D., 2012. Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less.  Public Relations Review,  38(2), pp.313-318. Manetti, G. and Toccafondi, S., 2012. The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance.  Journal of Business Ethics,  107(3), pp.363-377. Mason, C. and Simmons, J., 2014. Embedding corporate social responsibility in corporate governance: A stakeholder systems approach.  Journal of Business Ethics,  119(1), pp.77-86. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J.G., Sun, P. and Siegel, D., 2016. A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: toward a multi-theoretical integration.  Journal of Management,  42(1), pp.143-173. Murillo-Luna, J.L., Garcà ©s-Ayerbe, C. and Rivera-Torres, P., 2011. Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies.  Journal of Cleaner Production,  19(13), pp.1417-1425. Neubaum, D.O., Dibrell, C. and Craig, J.B., 2012. Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses.  Journal of Family Business Strategy,  3(1), pp.28-37. Nguyen, B. and Mutum, D.S., 2012. A review of customer relationship management: successes, advances, pitfalls and futures.  Business Process Management Journal,  18(3), pp.400-419. Pondeville, S., Swaen, V. and De Rongà ©, Y., 2013. Environmental management control systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors.  Management accounting research,  24(4), pp.317-332. Rozanski, N. and Woods, E., 2011.  Software systems architecture: working with stakeholders using viewpoints and perspectives. Addison-Wesley. Smith, M.H., 2013.  The natural advantage of nations: business opportunities, innovation and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan. Turner, R. and Zolin, R., 2012. Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames.  Project Management Journal,  43(5), pp.87-99. Vargo, S.L., 2011. Market systems, stakeholders and value propositions: Toward a service-dominant logic-based theory of the market.  European Journal of Marketing,  45(1/2), pp.217-222. Vasi, I.B. and King, B.G., 2012. Social movements, risk perceptions, and economic ou es: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism on firms’ perceived environmental risk and financial performance.  American Sociological Review,  77(4), pp.573-596. Yang, J., Shen, G.Q., Ho, M., Drew, D.S. and Xue, X., 2011. Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies.  International Journal of Project Management,  29(7), pp.900-910.